(HC) Odom v. De La Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, No. 2:17-cv-0233 JAM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER D.G. ADAMS, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request to expand the record and add additional facts, ECF No. 48, which the court construes as a motion for clarification. In her request, petitioner states that she would like to file additional documents related to her conviction for torture, including new evidence, but is unsure what steps she needs to take in order to do so properly. ECF No. 48. It is unclear whether petitioner is seeking to simply add additional documents in support of her petition or whether she is also seeking to file a late traverse or amend the petition. If petitioner is seeking to file a late traverse or to amend the petition, she must file a motion for leave that includes a copy of the proposed traverse or amended petition and explains her delay in filing. Any proposed amendments would…