(PS) Manning v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20212:19-cv-00494California697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. MANNING, No. 2:19-cv-00494-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Anthony L. Manning (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On December 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. (ECF No. 77.) On December 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No 78.) Defendant filed a Response to the objections on December 28, 2020. (ECF No. 79.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.