Anderson

(PS) Renfro v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20212:19-cv-00001California2,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RANDY C. RENFRO, Case No. 2:19-cv-00001-JAM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE DENIED ALAN ANDERSON AND IMBEE, INC., AND THAT ANDERSON BE PERMITTED 21 DAYS TO FILE AN ANSWER Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

14 ECF No. 17

16 Plaintiff Randy Renfro (“plaintiff”) proceeds in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), claiming that he resides in the state of California, that neither Alan Anderson nor Imbee, Inc., (“defendants”) reside in California, and that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff claims that on December 30, 2017, Anderson made, executed, and delivered a check to plaintiff in the amount of $129,301.09, drawn in the name of Imbee-fruit punch. Id. at 2; ECF No 1-2 at 2. Plaintiff further claims that, when presented to the drawee bank two times, the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. ECF No. 1 at 2.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.