Chamberlain

(PC) Green v. Chamberlain

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20212:19-cv-00109California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VENCIL C. GREEN, No. 2:19-CV-0109-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NASARIA CHAMBERLAIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court’ is Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendants to reply to his requests for admission. ECF No. 47. Typically, in actions involving an incarcerated party, the opposing party has 21 days to respond to a motion. L.R. 230(l). Defendants have not yet filed any opposition. Plaintiff’s motion, however, is both defective and premature. Because Defendants will not be prejudiced by immediate resolution of the motion, the Court dispenses with the allotted time and denies the motion. Plaintiff contends that Defendants have not responded to his second and third requests for admissions and interrogatories regarding Defendants Reynolds and Bennet. ECF No. 47 at 1. Nor, according to Plaintiff, have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.