(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20212:19-cv-01841California352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES NELSON, JR., No. 2:19-cv-1841 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 7, 2020, the court received a notice from the Sacramento County Jail stating that plaintiff had been released from custody on November 18, 2020. ECF No. 10. On January 4, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a notice of change of address or notify the court that he was still in custody within fourteen days, and was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has not responded to that order. Moreover, although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.