Oddo

(HC) Hanrahan v. Oddo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20212:19-cv-00641California1,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HANRAHAN, No. 2:19-cv-0641 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS L.J. ODDO, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the petition be dismissed. Background This action was filed on August 22, 2017, in the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On April 16, 2019, the Chief Judge of the Pennsylvania court wrote a lengthy memorandum setting forth the background of petitioner’s case (ECF No. 13 at 1-4), not repeated here, and noted that “neither the judgment nor the sentencing transcript reference an adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b).” (ECF No. 13 at 10.) After finding that “[o]nly the sentencing court can clarify its intent concerning a § 5G1.3(b) adjustment,” the case was transferred to this district on April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.