(PC)Wells

(PC)Wells v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20212:20-cv-01557California1,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE WELLS, No. 2:20-cv-1557 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court are plaintiff’s two motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. See ECF Nos. 28, 30. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that the motions be denied. I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE Plaintiff initiated this action in August 2020, with a letter claiming that his life was in jeopardy. ECF No. 1. His First Amended Complaint, ECF Nos. 26, was filed in November 2020 and has not yet been screened. Plaintiff has filed numerous requests for miscellaneous relief and court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.