LLoyd

(PS) Alston v. LLoyd

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20212:18-cv-02420California2,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Eric Anthony Alston, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Vacate Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b), which the Court construes as a Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59(e). (ECF No. 80.) Defendants filed an Opposition. (ECF No. 81.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on September 4, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) The original Complaint asserted claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and state law against the County of Sacramento, Sheriff Scott Jones, Captain Eric Buehler, Sergeant Connor Milligan, and Deputies Iniguez, Ball, Lloyd,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.