Pratti

(PC) Anglin v. Pratti

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20211:19-cv-01334California689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND ANGLIN, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01334-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. ) TO STAY AND VACATING DISCOVERY AND

DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES

) M. PRATTI, et al., ) (ECF No. 36) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Raymond Anglin is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 30, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, along with a separate motion to stay discovery and vacate the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF Nos. 35, 36.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition and the time to do so has expired. Local Rule 230(l). I. DISCUSSION The Court is vested with broad discretion to manage discovery. Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. U.S., 709 F.3d 749, 751…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.