(PS)Crane

(PS)Crane v. Juhasz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20212:21-cv-00022California1,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JODI L. CRANE, No. 2:21-cv-00022-TLN-CKDPS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF DUNSMUIR et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915. (ECF No 4.) Currently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’sfirst amended complaint. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons below, the court will grantthe motion. 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed this civil rights action against the City of Dunsmuir and various city officials in the Northern District of California. The Northern District granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 4), and screenedthe original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915. (ECF No. 9.) In the screening order, the court identified three deficiencies in plaintiff’s original complaint. First, the court found that the original complaint failed to state a claim for relief. Id. at 3. To state a claim for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.