Dickerson

(PC) Ramsey v. Dickerson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20211:19-cv-00666California4,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BRANDON RAMSEY, 1:19-cv-00666-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO EITHER:

vs. (1) FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT, OR

C/O A. DICKERSON, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE IS Defendants. WILLING TO PROCEED ONLY

WITH THE EXCESSIVE FORCE

CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANTS

DICKERSON, JIMENEZ, BORLINA,

AND SANTIAGO FOUND

COGNIZABLE BY THE COURT,

DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OR

NOTIFY COURT

22 I. BACKGROUND David Brandon Ramsey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action at the Sacramento Division of the U.S. District Court 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.