Martinez

(PC) Bledsoe v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20212:18-cv-02710California3,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNELL BLEDSOE, SR., No. 2:18-cv-2710 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

SGT. MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate. He is proceeding pro se, and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Martinez’ motion for terminating sanctions is before the court. As discussed below, defendants’ motion is partially granted. I. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint Plaintiff alleges that defendant Sgt. Martinez retaliated against plaintiff for filing a grievance against Martinez, by allegedly planting evidence on plaintiff that caused plaintiff to serve additional days in jail, violating plaintiff’s First Amendment rights. (ECF No. 11.) II. Procedural History This action was filed on October 5, 2018, after plaintiff was out of custody. After multiple amendments, plaintiff’s retaliation claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.