Kernan

(PC) Hill v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20212:19-cv-00184California1,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 KENNETH HILL, 2:19-cv-0184 TLN DB P 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER

Y. AYALA,

Defendant. 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant discriminated against him based on plaintiff’s participation in a mental health program when he sought family visits and a job. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to produce documents and defendant’s motion to modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order. For the reasons set forth below, this court denies plaintiff’s motion and grants defendant’s. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”). (ECF No. 18.) On screening, this court found plaintiff stated a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) against defendant Ayala for her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.