Leon

(PC) Ruiz v. Leon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20212:19-cv-02201California243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-cv-2201 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. LEON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed with this action in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On January 22, 2021, plaintiff filed a request that the court appoint plaintiff a Spanish interpreter. The expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when authorized by Congress. Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1989). The in forma pauperis statute does not authorize the expenditure of public funds for interpreters, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the court is not aware of any other authority that does. ///// ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs request that the court appoint 2 hima Spanish interpreter (ECF No. 16) is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.