Covello

(HC) Roessler v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20212:19-cv-02422California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL LEE ROESSLER, Case No. 2:19-cv-02422-KJM-JDP (HC) Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

PATRICK COVELLO,

OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS

Respondent.

15 16 Petitioner filed this habeas action on December 2, 2019. ECF No. 1. On March 20, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. On April 20, 2020, after the period for petitioner to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition had passed, Judge Brennan1 entered an order directing petitioner to respond to the motion to dismiss within twenty-one days. ECF No. 15. Petitioner then sought, and was granted, numerous extensions of time to respond. ECF Nos. 16-25, 27-28. Despite being granted additional time, petitioner never responded to the motion. On January 20, 2021, I entered an order directing petitioner to show cause within fourteen days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.