(PS) Kim v. Capital One National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20212:20-cv-02354California916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEHYON KIM, No. 2:20-cv-2354 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION,

15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Sehyon Kim is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 2, 2020, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss for hearing before the undersigned on January 8, 2021. (ECF No. 7.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on January 4, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this action should not be 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.