Creamer
Creamer v. Sherer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 BRUCE WARREN CREAMER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00293-NONE-BAM
Plaintiff,
SECOND SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT
SUSIE SHERER, et al., (Doc. No. 7) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Bruce Warren Creamer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant action on February 26, 2020. (Doc. 1.) On June 8, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s original complaint and granted him leave to amend his complaint. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on July 7, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 7.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary…