(HC) Howell v. Black

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20211:20-cv-00731California228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONNIE E. HOWELL, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00731-NONE-JLT (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER CONSTRUING MOTION TO DISMISS IN ) PART AS MOTION TO AMEND TO NAME v. ) PROPER RESPONDENT ) ADMINISTRATOR OF ATASCADERO ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND AND

STATE MENTAL HOSPITAL,

) DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CHANGE ) NAME OF RESPONDENT Respondent. )

On December 18, 2020, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss, in which Respondent notes that the current Executive Director of Atascadero State Hospital is Jason Black and requesting that this Court substitute Jason Black as the Respondent in this matter. (Doc. 23 at 1, n.1.) The Court will construe this as a motion to amend to name the proper respondent and grant the motion. Because it appears Jason Black is a proper party (Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996); Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.