Sanchez

Sanchez v. City of Roseville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20212:19-cv-01086California9,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 FELIX SANCHEZ, JR., No. 2:19-cv-01086-WBS-DB Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CITY OF ROSEVILE; ROSEVILLE

POLICE DEPARTMENT; DANIEL

MEDINA; CURTIS WATKINS; ADARIS

WILSON; BRANDON FERNANDEZ; DOES

1 through 3, inclusive, Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Felix Sanchez, Jr. (“plaintiff”) brought this action against the City of Roseville (“Roseville”); the Roseville Police Department; Officers Daniel Medina, Curtis Watkins, and Adaris Wilson; Sergeant Brandon Fernandez; and DOES 1-3 seeking damages against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of the Fourth Amendment and malicious prosecution, and for violation of the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 52.1(c). Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department, 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.