Spearman

(HC) Knight v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20212:19-cv-01633California5,711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE V. KNIGHT, No. 2:19-cv-1633 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MARION E. SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 I. Introduction Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On November 3, 2020, the district court remanded the case for the undersigned to consider whether this case should be stayed to allow petitioner to exhaust claim three, or whether claim three should be denied on the merits. Accordingly, the undersigned vacates the findings and recommendations and addresses respondent’s motion to dismiss anew. Respondent moves to dismiss the petition on several grounds: (1) claim three is unexhausted; (2) petitioner’s first and second claims alleging he is entitled to a youth offender parole hearing do not establish a basis for federal habeas relief; (3) such claims are barred by the one-year statute of limitations; and (4) the instant petition is moot because on October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.