Yeh

(PC) Ilsung v. Yeh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20212:20-cv-01032California4,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORY ILSUNG, No. 2:20-cv-1032 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL YEH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendant violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by failing to provide treatment and accommodation for a serious medical condition. Plaintiff also appears to claim his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) were violated by the failure of the defendant to provide accommodation for plaintiff’s disability. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.