(PS) Davidzon v. SF Markets, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20212:20-cv-02221California1,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADISLAV DAVIDZON., No. 2:20-CV-2221-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SF MARKETS, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 6. 19 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s original complaint, filed in the Shasta County Superior Court and removed to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s complaint, which is presented on a state court small claims form, contains the following declaration of alleged facts:

On September 1, 2020, Corey Cockrum and SF Markets, LLC, refused to honor their obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act to allow me to shop without a mask. Redding Police were called at my request.

When the officer arrives, he walked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.