Hernandez

Hernandez v. Bobst, North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20211:19-cv-00882California1,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and BECKY Case No. 1:19-cv-00882-NONE-SKO

HERNANDEZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO BAR EX PARTE

DECEMBER 1, 2020 EXPERIMENT

v. (Doc. 37) BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant.

17 _____________________________________/ 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bobst Group North America, Inc.’s “Motion to Bar Ex Parte December 1, 2020 Experiment” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, which was filed January 18, 2021 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 37.) Plaintiffs timely filed an opposition to the Motion on January 27, 2021. (Doc. 43.) No reply brief was filed. The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for February 3, 2021, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 44.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied. /// /// 1 On June 27, 2019, Plaintiffs Michael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.