Ceballos

(PC) Howell v. Ceballos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20211:19-cv-01353California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAREEM J. HOWELL ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01353-DAD-SAB (PC) ? Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

v. CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO Wl ) REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

I. CEBALLOS, et al., PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL

D RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 29) 14 Plaintiff Kareem J. Howell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights actior 16 || pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with eac 18 || party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 29.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this actic 19 || has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9 20 || Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.