(PC) Scott v. California Health Care Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:18-cv-00635California250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD SCOTT, No. 2:18-cv-0635 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE

FACILITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 29, 2020, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff was granted until February 1, 2021 to file a second amended complaint and has not done so. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.