Carey

Storz Management Co. v. Carey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:18-cv-00068California1,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STORZ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a No. 2:18-cv-00068-TLN-DB California Corporation, and STORZ REALTY, INC., Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

v. THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING ANDREW CAREY, an individual, and MARK WEINER, an individual, 16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Storz Management Company (“SMC”) and Storz Realty, Inc.’s (“SRI”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Ruling denying Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions. (ECF No. 92.) Defendants Andrew Carey (“Carey”) and Mark Weiner (“Weiner”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 96.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 97.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, who were SMC’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.