Stewart
Stewart v. Fu
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER STEWART, No. 2:19–cv–0286–JAM–CKD Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL v. (ECF No. 35) LAW FU, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is defendant the County of Sacramento’s1 motion to compel plaintiff Christopher Stewart to furnish responses to its Interrogatories, Set One, and Requests for Production, Sets One and Two. (ECF No. 35.) The motion was noticed for hearing before the undersigned on February 10, 2021, making plaintiff’s opposition due no later than February 3, 2021. See E.D. Cal. R. 251(e). Having received no opposition by that date, the court took the motion under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (ECF No. 39.) The court now GRANTS defendant’s motion to compel. //// //// 26 1 Defendant asserts that it is erroneously sued as Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department and Sacramento County Office of County Counsel. (ECF No. 36 at 1.) 2 This matter is before the undersigned…