Monterrosa

Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:20-cv-01563California10,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEFTALI MONTERROSA; NORA No. 2:20-cv-01563-TLN-DB

MONTERROSA; MICHELLE

MONTERROSA; and ASHLEY

MONTERROSA,

ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 CITY OF VALLEJO and JARRETT TONN, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants City of Vallejo (“the City”) and Jarrett Tonn’s (“Tonn”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motions to Dismiss and Strike, Motion to Transfer Venue, and Motion for Protective Order. (ECF Nos. 5, 6, 7.) Plaintiffs Neftali Monterrosa (“Neftali”), Nora Monterrosa (“Nora”), Michelle Monterrosa (“Michelle”), and Ashley Monterrosa (“Ashley”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed oppositions to each of Defendants’ motions (ECF Nos. 16, 17, 18), and Defendants have filed replies (ECF Nos. 22, 23, 24). Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants have filed an opposition (ECF No. 30) and Plaintiffs have filed a reply (ECF No. 31). For the reasons set forth herein,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.