(PS) Nguyen v. Cache Creek Casino Resort

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:20-cv-01748California1,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUNG M. NGUYEN, No. 2:20-cv-01748-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CACHE CREEK CASINO RESORT, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Hung M. Nguyen’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s September 4, 2020 Order (ECF No. 5) denying Plaintiff’s request to utilize the Court’s electronic filing services. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action on August 31, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Concurrently with his Complaint, Plaintiff filed a “Motion of Stipulation to the Court to Grant EFiling Access as Plaintiff as Pro Per Se in This Subject Matter,” in which he sought the magistrate judge’s permission under Local Rule 133(b)(2) to utilize the Court’s electronic case management/filing system (“CM/ECF”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.