Shearer

(PC) Ruiz v. Shearer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:20-cv-02078California1,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-02078-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. SHEARER, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Rogelio Ruiz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 15, 2021, the Court issued an Order in which it held that Plaintiff had accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and denied his Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 10, 13.) In addition, the Court found Plaintiff did not meet the exception to the three strikes rule by showing he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time his Complaint was filed. (See id.); see also Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1189 (9th Cir. 2015). On January 25, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion titled “Motion: Request for Interpreter Counsel and Request Motion in Forma Pauperis to be Granted,” in which he argues that he should qualify for the imminent danger exception to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.