(PS) Warfield v. Attorney General State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20212:21-cv-00157California1,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK J. WARFIELD, No. 2:21–cv–00157–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS

v. (ECF No. 1, 2) ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application in support of makes the showing required by the statute, and so the request to proceed IFP is granted. The determination that a plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court is directed to dismiss the case at any time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. The court finds plaintiff’s complaint is frivolous and seeks relief against immune defendants. Therefore,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.