(PC) Howell v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20211:19-cv-00822California245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM HOWELL, No. 1:19-cv-00822-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV.

v. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) D. GONZALES, ET. AL.; (Doc. No. 22) Defendants. 16 On February 10, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with 17 Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice, noting that the parties have resolved the case in its entirety and stating each party will bear their own attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. See Doc. No. 22. Considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 22 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 23 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 24 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 22) this is action is dismissed with 25 prejudice. 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.