Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20211:20-cv-01047California1,182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANA GRAY, No. 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART

A. KHOO, et al., (Doc. No. 28) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Dana Gray is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 5, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and issued the pending findings and recommendations, recommending that the following claims be permitted to proceed: those claims brought against defendants Mitchell, Singh, Showalter, and Song for denial of plaintiff’s revision surgery in violation of the Eighth Amendment; those claims brought against defendant Mitchell for directing that plaintiff’s Gabapentin be terminated in violation of the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.