Cuellar
(PC) Mills v. Cuellar
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20211:20-cv-01247California1,034 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAKAN CHAMEL MILLS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01247-NONE-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
v. DIAZ BE DISMISSED FROM THIS
ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
R. CUELLAR, et al., PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 4(M)
Defendants. (ECF NOS. 19 & 21)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS 17 I. BACKGROUND Jakan Mills (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds “on Plaintiff’s complaint filed September 3, 2020 (ECF 1), on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendants Cuellar and Diaz.” (ECF No. 15, p. 1). All other claims and defendants were dismissed. (ECF No. 23). Defendant Diaz has not been served. On December 9, 2020, the Court received an Amended Notice of…