Conrad

(PC) Howell v. Conrad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20212:19-cv-02551California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2:19-cv-2551 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CONRAD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims officers refused to give him his property in retaliation for filing staff complaints and civil suits. On January 25, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 22.) Thereafter, the court directed defendants to indicate whether they had any objection to plaintiff’s dismissal. (ECF No. 23.) Defendants1 Baker, A. Konrad, Nelson, and Tillo have filed a statement of non-opposition and also filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice signed by the plaintiff. Defendants have not indicated in this action whether they consent or decline to //// 26 1 Upon screening the complaint, the court found plaintiff had not stated a claim against defendant 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.