Kaur

(PC) Klinefelter v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20212:20-cv-01429California1,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEFFREY SCOTT KLINEFELTER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01429-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. CASE GURMEET KAUR, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST DENIAL OF

Defendant. ACCESS TO COURTS CLAIM PROCEED

AND HIS SECOND DENIAL OF ACCESS TO

COURTS CLAIM BE DISMISSED FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS

17 ECF No. 12

19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. In his amended complaint, which is before the court for screening, plaintiff alleges that defendant Gurmeet Kaur interfered with his access to courts on two occasions. For the reasons stated below, I find that plaintiff’s first access to courts claim is cognizable to proceed, but his remaining claim should be dismissed without leave to amend. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.