Kaur
(PC) Klinefelter v. Kaur
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20212:20-cv-01429California1,200 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEFFREY SCOTT KLINEFELTER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01429-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT
ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS
v. CASE GURMEET KAUR, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST DENIAL OF
Defendant. ACCESS TO COURTS CLAIM PROCEED
AND HIS SECOND DENIAL OF ACCESS TO
COURTS CLAIM BE DISMISSED FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
17 ECF No. 12
19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. In his amended complaint, which is before the court for screening, plaintiff alleges that defendant Gurmeet Kaur interfered with his access to courts on two occasions. For the reasons stated below, I find that plaintiff’s first access to courts claim is cognizable to proceed, but his remaining claim should be dismissed without leave to amend. …