Mar
Mar v. Betts Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 JOSEPH MAR, individually, and on No. 1:19-cv-00786-NONE-BAM behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated; ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS
COUNSEL FEES AND COSTS AND
vs. ENHANCEMENT PAYMENT
BETTS COMPANY, et al., (Doc. Nos. 22, 26) 16 Defendants. 17 On September 11, 2020, Plaintiff Joseph Mar (“plaintiff”), individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, filed a Motion for Class Counsel Fees and Costs and Enhancement Payment. (Doc. No. 22.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (See Doc. No. 11.) On October 26, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the Motion for Class Counsel Fees and Costs and Enhancement Payment be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. No. 26.) The findings and recommendations were served…