Mar

Mar v. Betts Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20211:19-cv-00786California911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 JOSEPH MAR, individually, and on No. 1:19-cv-00786-NONE-BAM behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated; ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS

COUNSEL FEES AND COSTS AND

vs. ENHANCEMENT PAYMENT

BETTS COMPANY, et al., (Doc. Nos. 22, 26) 16 Defendants. 17 On September 11, 2020, Plaintiff Joseph Mar (“plaintiff”), individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, filed a Motion for Class Counsel Fees and Costs and Enhancement Payment. (Doc. No. 22.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (See Doc. No. 11.) On October 26, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the Motion for Class Counsel Fees and Costs and Enhancement Payment be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. No. 26.) The findings and recommendations were served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.