(HC) Chaudhry v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:19-cv-00682California1,758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMZAN ALI CHAUDHRY, No. 2:19-cv-00682-TLN-DMC Petitioner, v. ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner Ramzan Ali Chaudhry (“Petitioner”), proceeding with retained counsel, brings this Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 16.) On September 11, 2019, Respondents filed the “Government’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations” (ECF No. 20), which have been considered by the Court. On February 25, 2020, Respondents filed the “United States’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.