Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:20-cv-00354California4,755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 . 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he was suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint for screening. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will give plaintiff the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.