Dhaliwal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANBEER SINGH BRAR AND No. 1:21-cv-00162-DAD-JLT

AMANDEEP KAUR BRAR,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING ACTION v. FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PARGAT SINGH DHALIWAL, et al. 15 Defendants.

17 On February 10, 2021, plaintiffs filed the pending pro se action, as well as moved for a temporary restraining order and other relief. (Doc. Nos. 1–7.) The court reviewed the complaint in conjunction with its review of the motion for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiffs allege that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over their claims based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (See, e.g., Doc. No. 2.) However, plaintiffs’ subject matter jurisdiction allegations are facially deficient because it appears all of the parties are residents of California. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511…