Mkrtchyan

Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:17-cv-02366California3,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARAM MKRTCHYAN, No. 2:17-cv-02366-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA; SCOTT R. JONES;

GRANT NUGENT; DEPUTY

DOMINGUEZ; DEPUTY YANG;

DEPUTY GROUT; DEPUTY MEIER, and DOES 1-40, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Aram Mkrtchyan’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 24.) Defendants Sacramento County (“County”), Scott R. Jones (“Jones”), Grant Nugent (“Nugent”), Deputy Dominguez (“Dominguez”), Deputy Yang (“Yang”), Deputy Grout (“Grout”), and Deputy Meier (“Meier”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED (ECF No. 24) and Defendants’ prior Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is now GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s fifth through twelfth claims with leave to amend. /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.