Putin

(PS) Briggs v. Putin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:20-cv-01753California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIKKI LYNN BRIGGS, No. 2:20-cv-01753-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER VLADIMIR PUTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Vikki Lynn Briggs (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 5, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 3.) The thirty-day period has expired and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. Although it appears from the docket that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations were returned as undeliverable, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of Plaintiff’s current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.