(PS) Nguyen v. Cache Creek Casino Resort

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:20-cv-01748California1,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUNG M. NGUYEN, No. 2:20-cv-01748-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER

v. CACHE CREEK CASINO RESORT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Hung M. Nguyen (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 31.) On January 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 32), which have been considered by the Court. Concurrent with his Objections, Plaintiff additionally requests disqualification of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 and 28 U.S.C. § 144, which the Court construes as a Motion to Recuse/Disqualify. (Id.) Also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.