(PS) Expose v. Fay Servicing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:19-cv-01866-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. FAY SERVICING, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action in connection with a foreclosure. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 27 …