Kaur

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20212:16-cv-01828California1,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-01828-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gerald Spence’s (“Plaintiff”) letter addressed to the District Judge, which the Court construes as a Motion to Recuse/Disqualify the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 118.) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// 26 The Court additionally construes Plaintiff’s letter as a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (see ECF No. 113). However, to the extent Plaintiff sought reconsideration, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion on January 6, 2021 (ECF No. 123), and does not address that issue further in the instant Order. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.