(PC)Wright
(PC)Wright v. Hansan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL WEBSTER WRIGHT, Case No. 2:17-cv-00260-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
J. LEWIS, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL
RULES
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 18 On November 10, 2020, defendants filed a motion for terminating sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A). ECF No. 61. In violation of Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. Accordingly, on December 18, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 65. He was also ordered to file, within twenty-one days, a response to…