Ciolli

(PC) Luedtke v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20211:20-cv-00406California1,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00406-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO VOID IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILING

v. (ECF No. 25) CIOLLI, et al.,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

Defendants. CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY

THE FILING FEE

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 18 I. Introduction Plaintiff James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This action was initiated on March 19, 2020, and the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on May 19, 2020. (ECF Nos. 13, 15.) II. Motion to Void In Forma Pauperis Status On October 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Void In Forma Pauperis Filing,” claiming that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.