(PC) Grubbs v. Sacramento County Jail
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY RANDALL GRUBBS, Case No. 2:20-cv-01149-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On November 18, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and 18 notified plaintiff that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff was granted sixty days to 19 file an amended complaint. Id. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 21 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute 22 or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. 23 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 24 1440-41 (9th Cir.…