(PS) Kent v. Office of the Inspector General

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20212:21-cv-00296California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL JAMES KENT, No. 2:21-cv-0296 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding in pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. The federal venue statute provides that “[a] civil action in which a defendant is an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof acting in his official capacity or under color of legal authority, or an agency of the United States, or the United States, may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought in any judicial district in which (A) a defendant in the action resides, (B) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (C) the plaintiff resides if no real property is involved in the action.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(e)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.