(PS) Banga v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins. Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20212:18-cv-01072California3,936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAMLESH BANGA, No. 2:18-cv-01072 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMERIPRISE AUTO HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the court on (1) defendant IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company and Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.’s motion for a protective order regarding two deposition topics (ECF No. 103) and (2) plaintiff Kamlesh Banga’s motion to compel responsive documents to her requests for production 1 & 2, and to overrule defendant IDS’s objections to topics 1-24 of her Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice (ECF No. 104). The motions are both briefed in a joint statement located at ECF No. 104-1. Plaintiff filed an unauthorized supplemental opposition to the motion for a protective order (ECF No. 106), and this supplemental opposition is the subject of a motion to strike from defendants. (ECF No. 108). Plaintiff also moved to seal two documents which she states contains information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.